Dating hebrew scriptures dating spreadsheet saga nyc

19-Apr-2018 10:59

The Society's next discussion of "absolute dates" is found in the 1963 book All Scripture Is Inspired of God and Beneficial. The last of these is from The Encyclopedia Britannica, Eleventh Edition, Vol. It is not clear from this reference that the Eleventh Edition was published in 19.

Paragraph 2 on page 85 quotes three secular sources that support the 539 B. Not many readers would know this, so the information is concealed from the reader. Because it establishes that the correct information had been known by historians for a long time, and the Society did not want to stimulate its readers into thinking about the implications.

C., and that Cyrus came to power in 537 rather than in 536 B. While this is quite correct, the book engaged in no discussion of why the dates were revised by one year.See also page 14, P1, under "Cyrus," of Babylonian Chronology 626 B. Next, in paragraph 18, the 1968 Watchtower article states: Recognized authorities of today accept 539 B. In addition to the above quotations the following gives a small sampling from books of history representing a cross section of both general reference works and elementary textbooks.These brief quotations also show that this is not a date recently suggested, but one thoroughly investigated and generally accepted for the past sixty years. It should be noted that the date was accepted by many, but not all, scholars, at least as far back as the 1864 edition of Smith's Bible Dictionary.During the 1940s the Society changed the dates for various important events several times, and even since then the evidence on which those dates were claimed to be based has been changed dramatically.Here we examine how the Society has changed its view of the pivotal date for the fall of Babylon, 539 B. In the early 1940s the Society held that Babylon fell to the Medes and Persians in 538 B.

C., and that Cyrus came to power in 537 rather than in 536 B. While this is quite correct, the book engaged in no discussion of why the dates were revised by one year.

See also page 14, P1, under "Cyrus," of Babylonian Chronology 626 B. Next, in paragraph 18, the 1968 Watchtower article states: Recognized authorities of today accept 539 B. In addition to the above quotations the following gives a small sampling from books of history representing a cross section of both general reference works and elementary textbooks.

These brief quotations also show that this is not a date recently suggested, but one thoroughly investigated and generally accepted for the past sixty years. It should be noted that the date was accepted by many, but not all, scholars, at least as far back as the 1864 edition of Smith's Bible Dictionary.

During the 1940s the Society changed the dates for various important events several times, and even since then the evidence on which those dates were claimed to be based has been changed dramatically.

Here we examine how the Society has changed its view of the pivotal date for the fall of Babylon, 539 B. In the early 1940s the Society held that Babylon fell to the Medes and Persians in 538 B.

Alan Feuerbacher The Watchtower Society's current Bible dictionary Insight on the Scriptures has stated a fine principle to guide the Bible scholar who is interested in chronology.